Share Page:

Volume 28 , Issue 6
November/December 2013

Pages 15701580

Piezoelectric Alveolar Ridge-Splitting Technique with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Cohort Study with 2-Year Radiographic Results

Renzo Bassetti, Dr Med Dent/Mario Bassetti, Dr Med Dent/Regina Mericske-Stern, Prof Dr Med Dent/Norbert Enkling, PD Dr Med Dent

PMID: 24278926
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3174

Purpose: Extended grafting procedures in atrophic ridges are invasive and time-consuming and increase cost and patient morbidity. Therefore, ridge-splitting techniques have been suggested to enlarge alveolar crests. The aim of this cohort study was to report techniques and radiographic outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with a piezoelectric alveolar ridge-splitting technique (RST). Peri-implant bone-level changes (ΔIBL) of implants placed with (study group, SG) or without RST (control group, CG) were compared. Materials and Methods: Two cohorts (seven patients in each) were matched regarding implant type, position, and number; superstructure type; age; and gender and received 17 implants each. Crestal implant bone level (IBL) was measured at surgery (T0), loading (T1), and 1 year (T2) and 2 years after loading (T3). For all implants, ΔIBL values were determined from radiographs. Differences in ΔIBL between SG and CG were analyzed statistically (Mann-Whitney U test). Bone width was assessed intraoperatively, and vertical bone mapping was performed at T0, T1, and T3. Results: After a mean observation period of 27.4 months after surgery, the implant survival rate was 100%. Mean ΔIBL was 1.68 0.90 mm for SG and 1.04 0.78 mm for CG (P = .022). Increased ΔIBL in SG versus CG occurred mainly until T2. Between T2 and T3, ΔIBL was limited (0.11 1.20 mm for SG and 0.05 0.16 mm for CG; P = .546). Median bone width increased intraoperatively by 4.7 mm. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be suggested that RST is a well-functioning one-stage alternative to extended grafting procedures if the ridge shows adequate height. ΔIBL values indicated that implants with RST may fulfill accepted implant success criteria. However, during healing and the first year of loading, increased IBL alterations must be anticipated.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2022 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us