Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry
OHPD Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: OHPD

 

Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry

Edited by Prof. Dr. Jean-François Roulet, Prof. Dr. Dr. Niklaus P. Lang, Prof. Dr. Palle Holmstrup

Official journal of the Academy of Minimally Invasive Dentistry, the World Congress of Microdentistry, and the European Society of Preventive Dentistry

ISSN (print) 1602-1622 • ISSN (online) 1757-9996

Publication:

Summer 2003
Volume 1 , Issue 2



Pages: 111-128
Back
Share Abstract:

Cleaning Efficacy of a Manual Toothbrush with Tapered Filaments

Dörfer, C. E. / von Bethlenfalvy, E. R. / Kugel, B. / Pioch, T.

To compare the cleaning efficacy of (A): a newly developed manual toothbrush with tapered filaments (meridol®, GABA International, CH-Münchenstein) with (B): a standard flat trim manual toothbrush (ADA reference toothbrush) in vivo. 87 healthy participants took part in this study. Subjects were asked to abstain from all oral hygiene procedures for 48 hours. After plaque was scored (Turesky modification of the Quigley Hein Index), the subjects brushed their teeth under supervision with the two manual toothbrushes according to a split-mouth design. In total, a cleaning time of two minutes was given for the whole procedure with an alert after every 30 seconds. Immediately after brushing, plaque was scored again by the same investigator, who was blind with respect to the toothbrush used. Using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test for paired samples (p<0.05) the overall plaque scores were reduced for (A) from 1.95±0.48 to 1.02±0.41 (p<0.001), and (B) from 1.93±0.52 to 1.09±0.44 (p<0.001). At proximal surfaces the plaque scores were reduced (A) from 2.02±0.49 to 1.11±0.43 (p<0.001) and (B) from 2.01±0.52 to 1.20±0.45 (p<0.001). The relative plaque reductions overall were (A) 47.4±18.0% and (B) 44.1±15.6% (p=0.039), at proximal surfaces (A) 44.2±18.8% and (B) 40.5±15.9% (p=0.015), and at lingual surfaces (A) 30.6±28.1% and (B) 24.0±27.1% (p=0.016). Both brushes removed a significant amount of plaque. Overall and in areas difficult to reach, the meridol® toothbrush was superior to the ADA reference brush.

Keywords: manual toothbrush, plaque removal, mechanical plaque control, controlled clinical trial

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog