Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry
OHPD Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: OHPD

 

Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry

Edited by Prof. Dr. Jean-François Roulet, Prof. Dr. Dr. Niklaus P. Lang, Prof. Dr. Palle Holmstrup

Official journal of the Academy of Minimally Invasive Dentistry, the World Congress of Microdentistry, and the European Society of Preventive Dentistry

ISSN (print) 1602-1622 • ISSN (online) 1757-9996

Publication:

Fall 2012
Volume 10 , Issue 3



Pages: 219 - 224
PMID: 23094264
Back
Share Abstract:

Clinical Evaluation of the Plaque-removing Ability of Four Different Toothbrushes in Visually Impaired Children

Sharma, Asmita / Arora, Ruchi / Kenchappa, Mallikarjun / Bhayya, Deepak P. / Singh, Deepesh

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of plaque removal of four different toothbrushes in visually disabled children. Three manual toothbrushes with different bristle designs (Oral-B CrossAction 40-regular, Oral-B ShinyClean 40-soft, Oral-B Advantage 40-soft) were compared with an electric toothbrush with an oscillating rotating head (Colgate Motion).
Materials and Methods: Forty visually impaired children in a professional education center participated in the study and were divided into 4 groups of 10 participants each. To obtain a plaque-free condition at baseline, professional toothcleaning was performed on each participant. After instructions on how to use the toothbrushes, each group started the experiment using a differently designed toothbrush. After 1 week of application, the Quigley Hein plaque index (QHI) was used to assess the oral hygiene status of each participant. Student’s t-test was chosen for comparing brushes. P < 0.01 was considered as the significance level. Results were presented as mean standard deviation.
Results: The QHI values obtained with the electric Colgate Motion brush were the lowest (0.088 0.051) and Advantage (0.801 0.132) the highest. Although the QHI values with the manual Oral-B CrossAction (0.439 0.094) were lower than those with the Oral-B shiny clean (0.503 0.098), there was no statistical difference between the two.
Conclusion: The electric toothbrushes are still the most effective in the visually disabled group. However, because of cheaper cost, easier availability and use, the Oral-B CrossAction toothbrush with criss-cross bristles could be a suitable alternative.

Keywords: plaque, toothbrush, visually impaired

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog