Home Subscription Services

Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
OFPH Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: OFPH
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache

Edited by Barry J. Sessle, BDS, MDS, BSc, PhD, FRSC

Official Journal of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain,
the European, Asian, and Ibero-Latin Academies of Craniomandibular
Disorders, and the Australian Academy of Orofacial Pain

ISSN 2333-0384 (print) • ISSN 2333-0376 (online)

Winter 1996
Volume 10 , Issue 1

Share Abstract:

Reasons that patients do not return for appointments in the initial phase of treatment of temporomandibular disorders

DeBoever/Van Wormhoudt/DeBoever

Pages: 66-72
PMID: 8995918

Patients suffering from pain and dysfunction in the temporomandibular region sometimes ignore appointments after the initial examination. This form ofnoncompliance is well known and is often studied in patients suffering from recurrent headaches, arthritis, and lower back pain. Information on patients with temporomandibulr disorders (TMD) who fail to attend the next visits and do not comply with the proposed treatment is scarce. To 61 patients (aged 20 - 40 years) who did not attend the next visit after an initial examination and after discussing the treatment protocol, a questionnaire was mailed 6 monthes to 1 year after the first visit. The uestions related to reasons for not attending nd the possible treatment received. Some questions were also related to the present TMD stte. The clinical profiles of the nonattenders were compared to those of a group of 400 TMD patients who did finish the proposed treatment (positive control). The nonattenders had more pain and dysfunction at initial examination than did the treated patients. The treated patients reported a shorter duration of symptoms before seeking treatment than did the nonattenders, suggesting tht the latter group had a more chronic pain state. The main reason for no returning was that symptoms improved enough or disappeared completely and spontaneously without the proposed treatment. Sixteen patients did not return for further treatment for reasons linked to the dentist-patient relationship. Fifty-seven percent of the nonattenders reported to be symptom free or sufficiently improved. One year after the initial examination and without the proposed treatment, most still had some symptoms such as clicking (59%) and reduced opening (21%) but only 24% reported to be in need of treatment. h t u o m c d e v o r p m i e

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog