Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
OFPH Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: OFPH
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache

Edited by Barry J. Sessle, BDS, MDS, BSc, PhD, FRSC

Official Journal of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain,
the European, Asian, and Ibero-Latin Academies of Craniomandibular
Disorders, and the Australian Academy of Orofacial Pain

ISSN 2333-0384 (print) • ISSN 2333-0376 (online)

Publication:
Winter 2000
Volume 14 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

Generic Pain Intensity Scores Are Affected by Painful Comorbidity

Jens C. Turp, DDS, Dr Med Dent/Charles J. Kowalski, PhD/Christian S. Stohler, DMD, Dr Med Dent

Pages: 47-51
PMID: 11203737

Aims: To determine the degree to which the generic pain intensity rating (ie, overall and without reference to a particular body site) of facial pain patients being seen in a specialty setting for facial pain is influenced by painful comorbidity in body parts other than the face. Methods: In this prospective study, 40 consecutive female temporomandibular pain patients rated their generic pain on a 100-mm visual analog scale. After marking all painful body sites on pain drawings, patients were asked to rate the pain intensity for each of the indicated pain sites; the patients did not have access to the generic pain intensity score. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to correlate the generic pain intensity score with site-specific pain intensity ratings, their mean and maximum, and the number of pain sites. Results: The medians of the generic, maximum, and facial pain intensity scores were 49.5, 53, and 45.5, respectively. The generic pain intensity rating correlated more highly with the intensity scores reported for the most painful body site (r2 = 0.82; P < 0.001) than with the average rating across all painful sites (r2 = 0.62; P < 0.001), or the pain intensity score in the face (r2 = 0.61; P < 0.001). The number of pain sites did not correlate to any statistically significant degree with the generic pain intensity rating (r2 = 0.006; P = 0.65). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the maximum visual analog scale pain intensity score, observed in any body location, is a better reflection of the generic pain intensity rating than the corresponding score of the face. To avoid overrating or underrating of facial pain intensity, patients should be instructed to provide site-specific pain intensity scores if painful comorbidity is present.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog