Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
OFPH Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: OFPH
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache

Edited by Barry J. Sessle, BDS, MDS, BSc, PhD, FRSC

Official Journal of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain,
the European, Asian, and Ibero-Latin Academies of Craniomandibular
Disorders, and the Australian Academy of Orofacial Pain

ISSN 2333-0384 (print) • ISSN 2333-0376 (online)

Publication:
Spring 2008
Volume 22 , Issue 2

Back
Share Abstract:

Meta-analysis of Treatment Need for Temporomandibular Disorders in Adult Nonpatients

M. Ameer Al-Jundi, BDS, DDS, Dr Med Dent/Mike T. John, DDS, MPH, PhD/Juergen M. Setz, DDS, PhD/András Szentpétery, DDS, PhD/Oliver Kuss, Dr Sc Hum

PMID: 18548838

Aims: To determine the prevalence of treatment need for temporomandibular disorders in adult populations by meta-analysis of nonpatient studies and to investigate factors influencing temporomandibular disorder treatment-need estimates. Methods: Population-based and nonpatient studies of adult subjects with temporomandibular disorders published in the English language prior to July 2006 were systematically reviewed. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Science Citation Index Expanded) were searched (n = 641). To combine data, fixed- and random-effects meta-regression models were used. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess factors influencing treatment need estimates. Results: Of 676 articles identified, 17 (9,454 subjects) met the study criteria. The prevalence of treatment need for TMD in adults (95% confidence interval) was estimated to be 15.6% (10.0, 23.6) for the fixed effect model and 16.2% (11.2, 21.1) for the random-effects model. Criteria of estimating treatment need and place of study strongly influenced summary estimates of treatment need (P < .001). Need estimates derived from clinical TMD signs were higher than estimates based on subject-reported symptoms (P = .010). Estimates for younger subjects (19 to 45 years) were higher than for older subjects (46+ years; P = .013). Conclusion: The treatment need for TMD in the general adult population is substantial and varies according to definition, criteria, and age. Findings of this meta-analysis can be used for planning and allocating health-care resources. J OROFAC PAIN 2008; 22:97–107

Key words: epidemiology, temporomandibular disorders, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, treatment need

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog