LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 28 , Issue 3
Summer 2014

Pages 205–222


A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Usual Treatment Versus Psychosocial Interventions in the Treatment of Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorder Pain

Carolina Roldán-Barraza, DDS/Steffani Janko, DDS, PhD/Julio Villanueva, DDS, MBA/Ignacio Araya, DDS, MSc/Hans-Christoph Lauer, DDS, PhD


PMID: 25068215
DOI: 10.11607/ofph.1241

Aims: To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of occlusal splint therapy (“usual treatment”) and psychosocial interventions for the treatment of myofascial temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain in adult patients. Methods: Independent screening and evaluation of randomized clinical trials included comparisons between “usual treatment” based on splint therapy and psychosocial interventions for TMD treatment within electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE), ongoing trials databases (Current Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov), and additional sources. The outcomes selected for the systematic review were self-reported pain, pain interference, unassisted jaw opening without pain, muscle pain upon palpation, depression, and somatization. The effect measures were analyzed using a random-effect model (Review Manager computer program). Results: The outcomes “longterm self-reported pain” and “long-term depression” were significantly different for the comparisons of “usual treatment” and psychosocial interventions, and they favored the latter (P < .005 and P < .05, respectively). These results must be viewed with caution due to the limited number of studies available. A tendency toward greater improvements of psychological outcomes was observed for psychosocial interventions, while physical functioning was slightly more responsive to “usual treatment.” Conclusion: No evidence was found to distinguish the clinical effectiveness between “usual treatment” and psychosocial interventions for myofascial TMD pain. Future studies of TMD and related subdiagnoses should be reported according to core standardized outcomes to facilitate comparisons. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:205–222. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1241


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

JOFPH Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help