Home Subscription Services

Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
OFPH Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: OFPH
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache

Edited by Barry J. Sessle, BDS, MDS, BSc, PhD, FRSC

Official Journal of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain,
the European, Asian, and Ibero-Latin Academies of Craniomandibular
Disorders, and the Australian Academy of Orofacial Pain

ISSN 2333-0384 (print) • ISSN 2333-0376 (online)

Spring 2004
Volume 18 , Issue 2

Share Abstract:

Joint Tenderness, Jaw Opening, Chewing Velocity, and Bite Force in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Pain and Matched Healthy Control Subjects

Ragnheidur Hansdottir, DDS/Merete Bakke, DDS, PhD, Dr Odont/

Pages: 108-113
PMID: 15250430

Aims: To evaluate the effect of temporomandibular arthralgia on mandibular mobility, chewing, and bite force. Methods: Twenty female patients (ages 19 to 45 years) with unilateral temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain during chewing (49 27 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale) and provocation, as well as TMJ tenderness, were studied. The TMJ conditions were classified as disc derangement disorders (n = 9), osteoarthritis (n = 7), and inflammatory disorders (n = 4). The patients were compared with matched healthy volunteers without orofacial pain or tenderness. Exclusion criteria were the presence of fewer than 24 teeth or malocclusion. The methods used were (1) algometric assessment of the pressure pain threshold (PPT) over the TMJ; (2) clinical recordings of maximum jaw opening; (3) computerized kinematic assessment of maximum vertical distance, velocity, and cycle duration during chewing of soft gum; and (4) measurement of unilateral molar bite force. Results: The mean ( SD) PPT in the patients painful side (69 20 kPa; P = .000001) was significantly lower than in the control subjects (107 22 kPa). Jaw opening was also significantly less (P = .00003) in the patients (42 9 mm) than in the controls (52 4 mm). Chewing cycle duration and maximum closing velocity were significantly different (P .03) in the patients (948 185 milliseconds and 142 46 mm/s, respectively) versus the controls (765 102 milliseconds and 173 43 mm/s, respectively), and bite force was significantly lower (P = .000003) in the patients (238 99 N) than in the controls (394 80 N). Both bite force and jaw opening in patients were significantly correlated (P .02) with PPT (r = 0.53 and 0.63, respectively). Conclusion: These systematic findings supplement results from acute pain experiments and confirm indications from unspecified patient groups that the clinical presence of long-standing TMJ pain is associated with marked functional impairment. This impairment might be a result of reflex adaptation and long-term hypoactivity of the jaw muscles. J OROFAC PAIN 2004;18:108C113.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog