Home Subscription Services

Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
OFPH Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: OFPH
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache

Edited by Barry J. Sessle, BDS, MDS, BSc, PhD, FRSC

Official Journal of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain,
the European, Asian, and Ibero-Latin Academies of Craniomandibular
Disorders, and the Australian Academy of Orofacial Pain

ISSN 2333-0384 (print) • ISSN 2333-0376 (online)

Spring 2013
Volume 27 , Issue 2

Share Abstract:

Development of a Quality-Assessment Tool for Experimental Bruxism Studies:
 Reliability and Validity

Andreas Dawson, DDS, Odont Dr/Karen G. Raphael, PhD/Alan Glaros, PhD/Susanna Axelsson, DDS, PhD/Taro Arima, DDS, PhD/Malin Ernberg, DDS, PhD/Mauro Farella, DDS, PhD/Frank Lobbezoo, DDS, PhD/Daniele Manfredini, DDS, PhD/Ambra Michelotti, DDS, PhD/Peter Svensson, DDS, PhD, Dr Odont/Thomas List, DDS, PhD

Pages: 111-122
PMID: 23630683
DOI: 10.11607/jop.1065

Aims: To combine empirical evidence and expert opinion in a formal consensus method in order to develop a quality-assessment tool for experimental bruxism studies in systematic reviews. Methods: Tool development comprised five steps: (1) preliminary decisions, (2) item generation, (3) face-validity assessment, (4) reliability and discriminitive validity assessment, and (5) instrument refinement. The kappa value and phi-coefficient were calculated to assess inter-observer reliability and discriminative ability, respectively. Results: Following preliminary decisions and a literature review, a list of 52 items to be considered for inclusion in the tool was compiled. Eleven experts were invited to join a Delphi panel and 10 accepted. Four Delphi rounds reduced the preliminary tool—Quality-Assessment Tool for Experimental Bruxism Studies (Qu-ATEBS)— to 8 items: study aim, study sample, control condition or group, study design, experimental bruxism task, statistics, interpretation of results, and conflict of interest statement. Consensus among the Delphi panelists yielded good face validity. Inter-observer reliability was acceptable (k = 0.77). Discriminative validity was excellent (phi coefficient 1.0; P < .01). During refinement, 1 item (no. 8) was removed. Conclusion: Qu-ATEBS, the seven-item evidence-based quality assessment tool developed here for use in systematic reviews of experimental bruxism studies, exhibits face validity, excellent discriminative validity, and acceptable inter-observer reliability. Development of quality assessment tools for many other topics in the orofacial pain literature is needed and may follow the described procedure. J OrOfac Pain 2013;27:111–122. doi: 10.11607/jop.1065

Key words: bruxism, Delphi technique, masticatory muscles, pain measurement

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog