|
Chronic orofacial pain represents a diagnostic and treatment challenge
for the clinician. Some conditions, such as atypical facial
pain, still lack proper diagnostic criteria, and their etiology is not
known. The recent development of neurophysiological methods
and quantitative sensory testing for the examination of the trigeminal
somatosensory system offers several tools for diagnostic and
etiological investigation of orofacial pain. This review presents
some of these techniques and the results of their application in
studies on orofacial pain and sensory dysfunction. Clinical neurophysiological
investigation has greater diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity
than clinical examination in the detection of the neurogenic
abnormalities of either peripheral or central origin that may underlie
symptoms of orofacial pain and sensory dysfunction.
Neurophysiological testing may also reveal trigeminal pathology
when magnetic resonance imaging has failed to detect it, so these
methods should be considered complementary to each other in the
investigation of orofacial pain patients. The blink reflex, corneal
reflex, jaw jerk, sensory neurography of the inferior alveolar nerve,
and the recording of trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potentials
with near-nerve stimulation have all proved to be sensitive and reliable
in the detection of dysfunction of the myelinated sensory fibers
of the trigeminal nerve or its central connections within the brainstem.
With appropriately small thermodes, thermal quantitative
sensory testing is useful for the detection of trigeminal small-fiber
dysfunction (A and C). In neuropathic conditions, it is most sensitive
to lesions causing axonal injury. By combining different techniques
for investigation of the trigeminal system, an accurate topographical
diagnosis and profile of sensory fiber pathology can be
determined. Neurophysiological and quantitative sensory tests have
already highlighted some similarities among various orofacial pain
conditions and have shown heterogeneity within clinical diagnostic
categories. With the aid of neurophysiological recordings and
quantitative sensory testing, it is possible to approach a mechanism-
based classification of orofacial pain. J OROFAC PAIN 2004;
18:85–107.
|