Home Subscription Services

Journal of Laser Applications
Jola Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: JOLA


The Journal of Oral Laser Applications

Edited by Prof Dr Andreas Moritz and Prof G. Lynn Powell

Official publication of the European Society for Oral Laser Applications

ISSN (print) 1473-7809 • ISSN (online) 1867-5611

Winter 2006
Volume 6 , Issue 4

Pages: 259-263
Share Abstract:

Effect of Electrosurgery and Laser Gingivoplasty on the Temperature of Pulp, Bone, and Gingivae In Vitro

Millar, Brian J. / Louca, Christos / Davies, Brian R.

Purpose: Lasers are increasingly being used for gingival dental surgery and to replace the use of electrosurgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the temperature rise in hard and soft tissues when using lasers and electrosurgery units and for soft-tissue dental surgery. Materials and Methods: Gingivoplasty was carried out by one operator on fresh pigs’ jaws using two electrosurgery machines and three dental lasers (a CO2 laser and two diode lasers). The temperature in adjacent dental tissues was recorded using thermocouples located in bone, pulp, and gingivae. A total of 12 readings were recorded for each electrosurgery and laser unit at each location. Results: The temperature rise in the bone was 0.6 0.9C for the CO2 laser, 1.8 1.7C and 1.6 1.4C for the two diode lasers, and 3.6 1.7C and 2.3 1.5C with the two electrosurgery units. In the pulpal recordings, the temperature rise of 0.5 0.3C for the CO2 laser was significantly less (p < 0.001) than that recorded with the other two lasers, 1.7 0.7C and 1.2 0.6C. With electrosurgery, the temperature rise in the pulp was 1.6 0.8C and 2.1 1.1C. For the gingival recordings, the CO2 laser generated the highest temperature rise at 13.6 8.1C, which was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that with the diode lasers, 6.9 3.4C and 2.9 2.0C. The electrosurgery units generated a temperature rise in the gingivae of 1.7 1.2C and 1.8 2.0C. All three lasers generated higher temperatures in the gingiva than did the two electrosurgery units (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the temperature rise in any tissue between the high frequency (27 MHz) and low frequency (3 MHz) electrosurgery units. Conclusion: Heat generated during gingivoplasty is unlikely to be of concern when the equipment is used correctly, but caution is required with all electrosurgical and laser techniques, particularly the CO2 laser. Following the manufacturer’s guidelines and proper training are recommended.

Keywords: electrosurgery, carbon dioxide lasers, diode lasers, temperature rise

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


  © 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog