Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
JAD Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: JAD

 

The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Edited by Jean-François Roulet

ISSN (print) 1461-5185 • ISSN (online) 1757-9988

Publication:

January/February 2008
Volume 10 , Issue 1



Pages: 7-16
Back
Share Abstract:

Critical Analysis of the Influence of Different Parameters on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Adhesives to Dentin

Poitevin, André / De Munck, Jan / Van Landuyt, Kirsten / Coutinho, Eduardo / Peumans, Marleen / Lambrechts, Paul / Van Meerbeek, Bart

Purpose: To evaluate how six different test parameters (TP) of the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) methodology influence the test outcome. Materials and Methods: The microtensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to dentin was measured, and the resultant failure patterns and stress-time graphs were analyzed, varying the μTBS specimen-fixation mode (TP1), the microspecimen geometry (TP2), the microspecimen bond surface area (TP3), the remaining dentin thickness of the microspecimens (TP4), the procedure employed to glue the microspecimen to the μTBS jig (TP5), and the μTBS crosshead speed (TP6). Results: The orientation of the microspecimens to the actual interface primarily influenced the resultant μTBS value and the eventual failure pattern. A notched jig consistently yielded significantly higher μTBS values than samples fixed onto a flat jig or following a op-bottom design (TP1). A higher bond strength, a lower standard deviation/coefficient of variation, a failure closer to the interface, and a more representative number of specimens per tooth were obtained for nontrimmed, square microspecimens (TP2). The most reproducible results were obtained using square specimens of 1 mm2 (TP3), which could also be most easily prepared. The remaining dentin thickness (TP4) was an influential factor as well, whereas the microspecimen gluing protocol (TP5) and the crosshead speed (TP6) appeared less influential. Conclusion: As several test parameters significantly influenced the μTBS outcome, sufficient attention should be paid to these methodology variables with regard to the μTBS-test reliability and reproducibility.

Keywords: microtensile bond strength, test methodology, test parameters, bonding, dentin

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog