Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
JAD Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: JAD

 

The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Edited by Jean-François Roulet

ISSN (print) 1461-5185 • ISSN (online) 1757-9988

Publication:

July/August 2012
Volume 14 , Issue 4



Pages: 307 - 314
PMID: 22282762
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a22767
Back
Share Abstract:

What Do Microtensile Bond Strength Values of Adhesives Mean?

Söderholm, Karl-Johan / Geraldeli, Saulo / Shen, Chiayi

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that stress distribution is more complex than generally assumed during microtensile testing by determining the stress level in the adhesive region of a virtual dentin-adhesive-composite stick using FEA (finite element analysis).
Materials and Methods: A 3D FEA model simulating a dentin-adhesive-composite stick was analyzed. The length of the composite and the dentin was 5.0 mm each and the thickness of the adhesive layer was 0.02 mm. For the stress analysis, either only one lateral side of the stick or both end surfaces were attached. A 20-N load was then exerted on the stick with its 1.0 mm2 cross-sectional area, and von Mises stresses were calculated.
Results: Large variations in stress levels existed. The highest stresses were located in the dentin and composite sections, near the adhesive interface. The stress level in these regions in the stick attached to one lateral side was more than 5 times higher than the 20 MPa stress calculated by dividing the force with the crosssectional area. For the specimen glued to the ends of the sticks, the stress level differences at the bonded interfaces were around 22 MPa, which decreased to 12 to 14 MPa in the center of the adhesive. Thus, this load condition yielded von Mises stress levels at the interface that were closer to the expected stress level than were the lateral-side attached specimens.
Conclusion: The calculated stress levels were higher and more complex than the strength values obtained by dividing the load at failure by the cross-sectional area. Reported strength values from microtensile tests therefore do not represent the true bond strength values at either the dentin/adhesive or adhesive/composite interface. However, the high stress levels in dentin and composite may explain the cohesive failures reported in the literature.

Keywords: FEA, von Mises, modulus of elasticity, Poisson’s ratio, loading condition

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog