Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
September/October 2011
Volume 24 , Issue 5

Back
Share Abstract:

Influence of Resilient Support of Abutment Teeth on Fracture Resistance of All-Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures: An In Vitro Study

Martin Rosentritt, BSc, PhD/Michael Behr, DDS, PhD/Peter Scharnagl, DDS/Gerhard Handel, DDS, PhD/Carola Kolbeck, DDS, PhD

Pages: 465468
PMID: 21909489

Purpose: The influence of resilient support of abutment teeth on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) was tested in this study. Materials and Methods: Three groups (n = 8) of glass-infiltrated, alumina-based, all-ceramic FPDs that were adhesively bonded to human molar teeth were investigated. In control group A, teeth that were rigidly inserted in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin were used for thermocycling and mechanical loading (TCML), as well as for fracture testing. In group B, TCML was conducted on teeth that had their roots covered with a polyether layer. After TCML, the polyether layer was removed entirely, and the teeth were rigidly fixed in PMMA for fracture testing. In group C, teeth roots remained covered with a polyether layer during TCML as well as during fracture testing. Using a resilient attachment, tooth mobility was determined in axial, buccal, and oral directions. Results: Mean tooth mobility was 76 4 m in the axial direction, 278 41 m in the buccal direction, and 128 17 m in the oral direction. Group C showed the lowest mean fracture strength (polyether during both TCML and fracture testing) of 523 N. For group B (polyether during TCML but not during fracture testing), a fracture strength of 676 N was found, and for control group A (rigidly embedded teeth), it was 919 N. Conclusion: These results confirmed the influence of resilient attachments on the aging process and fracture strength testing of FPDs. Fracture resistance was significantly reduced when this particular interface was used in both TCML and fracture testing. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:465468.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog