LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 24 , Issue 5
September/October 2011

Pages 405–416


Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: Prosthodontic Maintenance Using Different Loading Protocols and Attachment Systems

Andrew Mackie, BDS, MFGDP, DClinDent, MRACDS/Karl Lyons, BDS, MDS, Cert Maxillofacial Pros, FRACDS/W. Murray Thomson, BSc, BDS, MA, MComDent, PhD/Alan G.T. Payne, BDS, MDent, DDSc, FCD


PMID: 21909481

Purpose: The aim of this research was to determine the long-term prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems. Materials and Methods: A total of 106 participants were allocated randomly to one of four different implant systems (Steri-Oss, Southern, Straumann, or Brånemark). Three different loading protocols (2, 6, and 12 weeks) were used with six different ball abutment patrices and their respective matrices (Steri-Oss rubber, Straumann gold, Straumann titanium, Brånemark gold, Southern plastic, and Southern gold/platinum). Prosthodontic maintenance events were documented prospectively from baseline until the 8-year recall according to predefined categories. Results: After 6 years, 90 participants attended recall and, thereafter, 68 participants were followed for 8 years. No significant differences were found between the number of prosthodontic maintenance events and the loading protocol used. Steri-Oss rubber matrices had the highest mean number of maintenance events at 32.2 ± 14.5 events, followed by the Brånemark gold matrices at 28.8 ± 12.6 events. The Southern plastic matrices had a significantly lower mean number of maintenance events (8.7 ± 4.2) when compared with all other groups. Over a 6-year period, the matrices with the best longevity were Straumann gold at 3.9 ± 2.1 years. Straumann gold matrices also lasted significantly longer than all other matrices (P < .05). Southern gold/platinum, Brånemark gold, and Southern plastic matrices all lasted significantly longer than the Straumann titanium and Steri-Oss matrices (P < .05). The mean time to reline for overdentures was 3.37 ± 2.06 years; remaking of overdentures peaked by year 7, with a mean time to remake of 5.81 ± 2.04 years. Conclusion: Early loading protocols do not influence long-term prosthodontic maintenance requirements of unsplinted mandibular two-implant overdentures. By contrast, attachment systems do influence prosthodontic maintenance, particularly with regard to the type of matrices used. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:405–416.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

IJP Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help