Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
January/February 2011
Volume 24 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes of Implant Treatments Provided at a Predoctoral Implant Program

Damian J. Lee, DDS/Rand F. Harlow, DDS/Judy Chia-Chun Yuan, DDS, MS/Cortino Sukotjo, DDS, MMS, PhD/Kent L. Knoernschild, DMD, MS/Stephen D. Campbell, DDS, MMSc

Pages: 7176
PMID: 21210008

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes from a predoctoral implant clinic over 3 years. Materials and Methods: All patients who received implant-retained mandibular overdentures (IODs) or a single-tooth implant (STI) restoration in the Predoctoral Implant Program at the University of Illinois-Chicago College of Dentistry between 2006 and 2009 were included in this study. A two-stage surgical placement and healing protocol was followed by oral surgery, periodontic, and prosthodontic specialty clinics. The following potential prognostic information was collected: patient age and sex; implant diameter, length, and sites; and complications related to the treatment. Life-table and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed for both IOD and STI patient groups. Results: A total of 371 implants were placed in 243 patients. There were 164 implants placed in 82 patients in the IOD group and 207 implants placed in 161 patients in the STI group. Two implants failed in the IOD group and 2 implants failed in the STI group. The cumulative survival rates for the implants in both the IOD and STI groups were 99%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups. The most common complication observed in the IOD group was damage to the attachment inserts, and for the STI group, it was repair or remaking of the definitive prosthesis. Conclusion: As demonstrated by the 3-year clinical outcomes, a predoctoral implant program can provide predictable patient-centered therapy with few complications. Patient therapy, guided by thoughtful diagnosis and driven by restorative outcome, can lead to favorable results. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:7176.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog