Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
January/February 2003
Volume 16 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

Fatigue Load of Teeth Restored with Bonded Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Inlays in MOD Class II Cavity Preparations

Alexander Shor, DMD, MSD, Jack I. Nicholls, PhD, Keith M. Phillips, DMD, MSD, Warren J. Libman, DDS, MSD

Pages: 6469
PMID: 12675458

Purpose: This study compared the fatigue life of human maxillary premolars restored with direct composites and indirect ceramic inlays in mesio-occlusodistal (MOD) cavities. Materials and Methods: Ten human maxillary premolars were divided into two groups of five and restored with (1) direct composite restorations, or (2) pressed ceramic restorations. Standardized MOD cavities were prepared for both groups. Teeth in the direct composite group were restored with Z250 composite and Single Bond adhesive, and those in the ceramic group were restored with IPS Empress ceramic inlays. The ceramic inlays were luted with Single Bond and RelyX ARC cement. Under the applied test load of 11.17 kg, strain measurements were recorded from an electric resistance stain gauge bonded to the buccal surface. These strains were recorded for the (1) intact tooth, (2) cavity preparation, and (3) restored tooth. These strain measurements were used to calculate the relative tooth compliance values for each tooth. The fatigue loading was applied until reinforcement loss was registered by the strain gauge. Results: A one-way ANOVA showed no significant compliance difference between the intact and restored tooth conditions, and no significant difference in fatigue cycles to failure between the two groups. Conclusion: There were both adhesive and cohesive failures in both restoration groups, indicating that the adhesive joint is not the only weak link in these restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:6469.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog