Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
July/August 2002
Volume 15 , Issue 4

Back
Share Abstract:

Influence of Prosthesis Fit and the Effect of a Luting System on the Prosthetic Connection Preload: An In Vitro Study

Joke Duyck, DDS, PhDa, Ignace Naert, DDS, PhDb

Pages: 389–396
PMID: 12170855

Purpose: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the efficiency of a luting technique that is said to compensate for misfits of implant-supported prostheses by means of a combined screw retained–luted fixation of the prostheses to the supporting abutments. Materials and Methods: One three-unit prosthesis was made on cylindric abutments, and one was made on conical abutments. Two more prostheses were made, one on the cylindric and one on the conical abutments, with the luting system. The preload was measured in different fit and misfit situations, with and without the use of the luting system. The preload is a combination of internal preload (positive axial forces), which is a clamping load that keeps the implantprosthesis components together, and external preload (axial forces and bending moments), which is the result of a deformation of the implant-prosthesis complex during fixation caused by prosthesis misfit. The external preload on the supporting abutments after screw tightening the prostheses was used as an indicator for the quality of fit of the prostheses. Results: The axial forces were lower and the bending moments were higher in cases of misfit in comparison with the optimal fit situation. The luting system generally did not decrease the registered external preload. Except for one test condition, even higher bending moments were registered on the supporting abutments when the luting system was used. Conclusion: For the prostheses evaluated in this study, the luting system was not effective in reducing the external preload on the supporting implants caused by prosthesis misfit. Although the luting system could compensate for visual misfit, it failed to really improve the load conditions of the supporting implants. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:389–396.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog