Home Subscription Services Books Journals Multimedia Events What's New Current Topics About Us Contact Us Help
 
 
 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterRSS

Publication:
International Journal of Prosthodontics
July/August 2002
Volume 15 , Issue 4

E-mail Abstract                Back

The Effect of Increasing Occlusal Vertical Dimension on Face Height

Martin D. Gross, BDS, LDS, RCS, MSca, Joseph Nissan, DMDb, Zeev Ormianer, DMDc, Shlomo Dvori, DMDd, Arie Shifman, DMDe

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) on the face height in completely dentate young adults. Materials and Methods: Faces of 22 subjects were photographed in a standardized manner in an anterior view. Sequential photographs were taken at intercuspation and clinical rest position, with four completearch maxillary occlusal overlays increasing OVD in interincisal increments of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm. Objective measurements were made from the photographs using facial reference markers. Ten observers made subjective evaluations of the resulting changes in face height using the sequential photographs randomly presented. Results: Measurements of the facial markers showed that on increasing OVD, a corresponding change in lower face height was 50% of the interincisal increase in intercuspation and 40% for clinical rest position. ANOVA for repeated measures showed a statistically significant effect of the intraoral increase in OVD on lower face height. However, subjective results showed that observers were not capable of detecting changes in face height caused by an intraoral increase in OVD (2 to 6 mm intrinsically). ANOVA for the difference between dentists and nondentists showed a minimal, but significant, difference between the two groups, with dentists erring slightly less. Conclusion: Attempts to alter face height by changing OVD within the range of 2 to 6 mm for esthetic reasons may not be visually distinguishable. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:353–357.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2010 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc,
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events
What's New | Current Topics | About Us | Contact Us | Help | Sitemap | Catalog