LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 23 , Issue 2
March/April 2010

Pages 160166


Attachment Systems for Mandibular Single-Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Retention Force Investigation on Different Designs

Nabeel Alsabeeha, DMD, MSc, MFDS RCPS/Momen Atieh, BDS, MSc/Michael V. Swain, BSc(Hons), PhD/Alan G. T. Payne, BDS, MDent, DDS, FCD


PMID: 20305857

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the retentive force of six different attachment systems used for mandibular single-implant overdentures, including two prototype large ball attachment designs. Materials and Methods: Two prototype ball attachments of larger dimensions (7.9 and 5.9 mm) and four commercially available ball and stud attachments of standard dimensions (2.25 and 4.0 mm) were evaluated on three identical test casts resembling an edentulous mandible with severe residual ridge resorption. Five samples from each attachment system (n = 30) were connected to three different implants (8.0-mm wide diameter, 3.75-mm regular diameter, and 4.0-mm regular diameter). An Instron testing machine with a computer software package was used to deliver a vertical dislodging force at a cross-head speed of 50 mm/min to each overdenture sample from the anterior direction. A total of 300 pull tests were conducted (50 per attachment system). The maximum load (retentive force) required to separate each overdenture from the supporting implant was then measured. Results: The highest retentive force (36.97 2.23 N) was achieved with the 7.9-mm prototype ball attachment design, followed in a decreasing order by the 5.9-mm prototype ball attachment design (32.06 2.59 N), the standard 2.25-mm ball attachment (17.32 3.68 N), Locator white (12.39 0.55 N), Locator pink (9.40 N 0.74 N), and Locator blue (3.83 0.64 N). A statistically significant difference (P < .0001) was found between all attachments. Conclusions: Attachment systems of larger dimensions provided higher retentive forces for mandibular single-implant overdentures. Further in vitro and in vivo research is necessary to determine prosthodontic outcomes with these attachments in edentulous patients prior to their routine clinical use internationally. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:160166.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

IJP Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help