Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
May/June 2002
Volume 15 , Issue 3

Back
Share Abstract:

Shock Absorbability and Hardness of Commercially Available Denture Teeth

Fumiaki Kawano, DDS, PhD, Takafumi Ohguri, DDS, PhD, Tetsuo Ichikawa, DDS, PhD, Iwate Mizuno, BS (Eng), Akira Hasegawa, MS (Eng), PhD

Pages: 243–247
PMID: 12066486

Purpose: Composite resin teeth are more widely used than porcelain or acrylic resin teeth in the fabrication of removable dentures because of their high fracture toughness and high abrasion resistance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shock absorbability of commercially available artificial posterior teeth by the free drop–ball test with an accelerometer and to evaluate the Vickers hardness at the surface. Materials and Methods: The tested artificial teeth included seven composite resin teeth, one acrylic resin tooth, and one porcelain tooth. Specimens were tested 50 hours after immersion in distilled water at 37°C. The impact value and Vickers hardness were measured. A one-way analysis of variance was used to analyzed the data (P = .05). Results: The composite resin teeth showed an intermediate impact value between that of the acrylic resin tooth and the porcelain tooth. Among the artificial teeth investigated, the porcelain tooth showed the highest impact value. A significant difference in the impact value was observed between the porcelain tooth and the composite resin and acrylic resin teeth. However, no significant difference was observed among the composite resin teeth tested. A significant correlation was found between the impact values and the Vickers hardness of the artificial teeth. Conclusion: The present findings suggest that composite resin teeth and acrylic resin teeth have a higher shock absorbability than porcelain teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:243–247.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog