LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 9 , Issue 1
January/February 1996

Pages 38-45


Failure rates of restorations for single-tooth replacement

Priest


PMID: 8630176

Failure rates of traditional fixed partial dentures, resin-bonded prostheses, and implant restorations for the replacement of a single missing tooth are compared in this literature review. A lack of documented longevity studies involving conventional fixed partial dentures makes failure rates difficult to determine. Reported failures ranged from only 3% over 23 years to 20% over 3 years. The major causes of loss were caries and endodontically and periodontally related complications. Research concerning resin-bonded fixed partial dentures was more prevalent, but indicated that overall retention of these prostheses may be unpredictable. Failure rates were quite divergent, ranging from 10% over 11 years to 54% over 11 months. Debonding was the usual cause of failure. Clinical reports of single-tooth implant replacements have followed stricter protocols than the other two alternatives. Short-term studies indicated favorable success rates for these restorations, but these must be confirmed by long-term evaluations. Failures ranged from 9% over 3 years to 0% over 6.6 years. These comparisons should be considered in treatment planning a restoration for the replacement of a single missing tooth.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

IJP Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help