Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
January/February 1998
Volume 11 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

Radiopacity of Dual-Cured and Chemical-Cured Resin-Based Cements

Rubo/El-Mowafy

Pages: 70-74
PMID: 9588993

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine radiopacity values of a group of resin-based cements and to compare them to those of enamel and dentin. Materials and Methods: Three specimens 2.5 mm thick were prepared from each of 18 cements (nine chemical-cured and nine dual-cured). Three tooth sections 2.5 mm thick were cut from extracted molars. Specimens and tooth sections were divided into three matching groups. Following standard radiographic techniques, images of each group of specimens, along with an aluminum step wedge were obtained. Optical density readings for each material were determined with a transmission densitometer. Radiopacity values were subsequently calculated as equivalents of aluminum thickness. Results: Analysis of variance indicated significant differences in radiopacity values among the materials (P < 0.0001). Four dual-cured cements (Variolink, Geristore, Enforce, and Nexus) had radiopacity values significantly greater than that of enamel, while two (Choice and Adherence) had radiopacity values similar to enamel. For the remaining three dual-cured cements, Duolink had a radiopacity value significantly lower than that of enamel but higher than that of dentin, while both Lute-It and Resinom er had values similar to dentin. For the chemical-cured cements, five materials had radiopacity values significantly higher than enamel (Sealbond, Advance, Scotchbond, Cement-It, and Dyract-Cem), while two had values significantly lower than enamel but higher than dentin (Biomer and Panavia 21). The remaining two cements had radiopacity values significantly lower than dentin. Conclusion: For a group of 18 resin-based cements, some had radiopacity values similar to or significantly lower than that of dentin.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog