Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
November/December 1999
Volume 12 , Issue 6

Back
Share Abstract:

Prosthodontic Decision Making Among General Dentists in Sweden. II: The Choice Between Fixed and Removable Partial Dentures

Mats Kronström, LDS/Sigvard Palmqvist, LDS, Odont Dr/Björn Söderfeldt, PhD, DrMedSc

Pages: 527-533
PMID: 10815606

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe how dentists evaluated various items related to a treatment choice between fixed partial dentures (FPD) and removable partial dentures (RPD), and to determine if the differences could be explained by dentist-related variables (’social and demographic attributes,’ ’job situation,’ and ’attitudes’). Materials and Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of 2,059 Swedish general dentists, with a response rate of 76%. In the questionnaire, the choice between FPDs and RPDs in a clinical situation was presented. The dentists were asked to mark on 14-item visual analogue scales the relative importance he or she gave the different items. The items were analyzed through principal components analysis, where a 3-factor solution was obtained; the factors were labeled as ’time,’ ’health,’ and ’comfort.’ The factors were run as dependent variables in multiple regression analyses. Results: Great individual variations were seen, but the differences between groups of dentists were small. The items evaluated as most important were ’patient’s wish,’ ’condition of possible abutment teeth,’ and ’prognosis for delivered treatment.’ Male dentists gave significantly greater importance to the ’health’ factor compared to female dentists. The attitudinal variable ’patient information’ showed significant associations with all 3 factors in the multivariate models. Conclusion: Great individual differences were seen regarding the importance of the various items. In multiple regression models, several independent variables showed significant associations, most interestingly the attitudinal variable ’patient information.’ Low explanatory (R2) values indicate that it is necessary to capture more variables of importance for the prosthodontic decision-making process.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog