Home Subscription Services

The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

January/February 2002
Volume 15 , Issue 1

Share Abstract:

Gingival Inflammatory Response Induced by Chemical Retraction Agents in Beagle Dogs

Igor Kopacˇ, DDS, MS,Erika Cvetko, DDS, PhD,Ljubo Marion, DDS, PhD

Pages: 14–19
PMID: 11887594

Purpose: The aim of this in vivo study on dogs was to investigate and compare the inflammatory potential of four different retraction agents on the gingival connective tissue. Materials and Methods: All procedures on eight beagle dogs were performed under general anesthesia: taking oral hygiene measures, placing retraction cords medicated with four chemical agents into the gingival sulci, and taking tissue biopsies. The specimens were evaluated after a 10-minute exposure to chemical agents. The inflammatory response of the connective tissue underlying the sulcular and junctional epithelium triggered by retraction agents was assessed quantitatively. Microscopic images of tissue specimens were morphometrically analyzed using a computer-assisted morphometric method. Results: The most intense inflammatory response in the connective tissue underlying the sulcular epithelium was triggered by astringent retraction agents—Racestyptine in specimens taken after 1 day and 1 week and Rastringent after 1 day (P < .05). Tetrahydrozoline-sympathomimetic vasoconstrictor (Visine) was found to have the lowest inflammatory potential. Retraction chemicals produced no significant effects on the connective tissue subjacent to the junctional epithelium. The ratio of the connective tissue area to that of the inflammatory infiltrate showed that 25% aluminum chloride (Racestyptine) was the most aggressive and tetrahydrozoline the least aggressive retraction agent used. Conclusion: All the retraction chemicals tested increased the infiltration with inflammatory cells in gingival connective tissue. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:14–19.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog