LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 14 , Issue 6
November/December 2001

Pages 536-542


A Longitudinal Study on Mandibular Implants Supporting an Overdenture: The Influence of Retention Mechanism and Anatomic-Prosthetic Variables on Periimplant Parameters

Matthias Oetterli, Dr Med Dent, Peter Kiener, Dr Med Dent, Regina Mericske-Stern, Dr Med Dent


PMID: 12066700

Purpose: The aim of this 5-year longitudinal study was to investigate the influence of the retention mechanism for overdenture fixation on the periimplant parameters of mandibular implants. Materials and Methods: Ninety edentulous patients, each with two interforaminal implants supporting an overdenture, participated in the study. They had received either a straight or slightly bent round clip bar, a U-shaped rigid bar with or without distal extensions, or single-ball anchors. Anatomic-morphologic and prosthetic variables were assessed related to the implant position and the type of overdenture retention. The degree of mandibular atrophy was determined using cephalometric radiographs. The angle β between the virtual axis connecting both implants and the mandibular hinge axis was measured on mounted casts. A supporting surface was identified between bent clip bars and U-shaped extension bars. Clinical periimplant parameters were recorded, and changes of the probing attachment level after 5 years were analyzed in 70 patients with respect to the retention device and anatomic-morphologic and prosthetic variables. Results: A significant increase of the Plaque Index was observed after 5 years. The mean clinical attachment loss after 5 years was about 0.2 mm. In more than 50%, β was small, ie, 5 degrees. For these implants, loss of clinical attachment was significantly lower. The correlation between attachment loss and β was weak, while no significant correlation was found with regard to the degree of atrophy and surface. Conclusion: In view of the long observation period, it was concluded that the position and retention mechanism of mandibular implants supporting an overdenture have little influence on the long-term stability of the clinical parameters. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:536C542.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

IJP Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help