Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
January/February 2009
Volume 22 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

Does the Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire Measure Dental Appearance?

Christian Mehl, Dr Med Dent/Matthias Kern, Prof Dr Med Dent/Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Dipl Stat, Dr Rer Nat/Mona Wolfart, Dr Med Dent/Simone Brunzel, Dr Med Dent/Stefan Wolfart, Prof Dr Med Dent

Pages: 87–93
PMID: 19260435

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a need to develop a new questionnaire measuring dental appearance or if this is already covered by the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49). Materials and Methods: Based on internationally accepted guidelines about dental esthetics, a questionnaire was developed to measure dental appearance (QDA). Eleven items defined a QDA sum score (0 = absolutely satisfied, 44 = absolutely dissatisfied). Furthermore, oral health–related quality of life was evaluated using the German version of the OHIP-49 and the OHIP-esthetic. Thirty patients (14 women, 16 men; mean age 59 ± 10 years) were included in the study. All patients received a complete oral rehabilitation including the anterior teeth of the maxilla. Questionnaires were completed before and after treatment. Results: The median values were 16 and 1.5 for the QDA sum score, 46 and 16 for the OHIP sum score, and 14.5 and 2 for the OHIP-esthetic before and after rehabilitation, respectively. The improvement after treatment was significant for all questionnaires (P £ .0001). Between the QDA sum score and the OHIP sum score or any of the OHIP subscales (the only exception being “psychological discomfort”), no significant correlation could be found (P > .05). Between the QDA sum score and the OHIP-esthetic, a significant correlation could be found before treatment (r = 0.505, P = .004) but not after treatment (P > .05). Conclusions: If the OHIP-49 is used in clinical studies and a profound evaluation of dental appearance is desired, it is reasonable to use an additional esthetic modulus. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:87–93.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog