Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
March/April 2001
Volume 14 , Issue 2

Back
Share Abstract:

A Laboratory Investigation of the Accuracy of Two Impression Techniques for Single-Tooth Implants

M. Firas Daoudi, DDS, LDS RCS, MSc (Lond), Derrick J. Setchell, BDS, MS (Mich), LDS RCS, FDS RCS, Lloyd J. Searson, BDS, MS (Mich), FDS RCS

Pages: 152158
PMID: 11843452

Purpose: This laboratory study investigated the accuracy of four implant impression procedures using two impression techniques and two different materials. Materials and Methods: A master model was used to produce 40 different stone casts incorporating laboratory implant or abutment analogues from the different combinations of two impression techniques (the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level and the pickup impression technique at the abutment level) and materials (President polyvinyl siloxane and Impregum F polyether). Variations in the resulting working casts were measured using the Reflex Microscope to derive distances and angles from the three-dimensional coordinates of optical targets that were attached to a test coping placed on the implant analogue and on a reference device positioned on the occlusal surfaces of the casts. Results: The results showed greater variations in analogue position with the repositioning impression technique than with the pickup technique. The rotational errors were large enough to be of clinical concern. No significant differences were found between polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials for the two tested types of impression techniques. Conclusion: The repositioning impression technique at the implant level can produce less predictable results than the pickup technique at the abutment level. The choice of impression material made no significant difference. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:152158.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog