LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 21 , Issue 2
March/April 2008

Pages 131–137


Survival and Complication Rates of Combined Tooth-Implant–Supported Fixed and Removable Partial Dentures

Hans-Joachim Nickenig, DMD, Dr Med Dent/Hubertus Spiekermann, PhD, DMD, Dr Med, Dr Med Dent, Dr hc/ Manfred Wichmann, PhD, DMD, Dr Med Dent/Schlegel Karl Andreas, PhD, MD, DMD Dr Med, Dr Med Dent/ Stephan Eitner, PhD, DMD, Dr Med Dent


PMID: 18546767

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess and compare clinical outcome results of tooth-implant–supported fixed and removable partial dentures in a selected population group of partially edentulous patients. Biological and technical complications were recorded and reviewed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the dental charts of 224 patients (174 men, 50 women) with a mean age of 51.3 years was carried out. The evaluation included details regarding the survival and technical complications of the prescribed prostheses, as well as the biological and technical complications associated with both types of abutments used, ie, teeth and implants. Results: A total of 229 prostheses were supported by 459 implants and 449 teeth. They were monitored for a period of 2 to 10 years (median follow-up time: 6.7 years). At the end of the different observation periods, 14% of the tooth-implant–supported prostheses had undergone technical modifications, with no statistical difference in the occurrence of technical complications between the 2 types of prosthesis. Three of the functionally loaded implants were removed, while 23 abutment teeth were lost (15 had undergone endodontic treatment). Abutment teeth with a reduced attachment level after prosthesis insertion were significantly affected by biological complications (P = .04). Conclusions: The survival data for both types of prosthesis were comparable to prostheses supported solely by implants. There was no difference in the complication rate between primary splinting (fixed) and secondary splinting with telescopic systems (removable). A greater risk of biological complications was recorded for endodontically treated abutments or teeth with a reduced attachment level. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:131–137.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

IJP Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help