Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
May/June 2007
Volume 20 , Issue 3

Back
Share Abstract:

Quality of Impressions Using Hydrophilic Polyvinyl Siloxane in a Clinical Study of 249 Patients

Ulrike Stephanie Beier, Dr Med Dent, MS / Ingrid Grunert, Univ-Prof DDr / Siegfried Kulmer, Univ-Prof DDr / Herbert Dumfahrt, Univ-Prof Dr

Pages: 270274
PMID: 17580459

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical success of a hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane impression material for fixed dental restorations under various clinical conditions. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,466 preparations for fixed restorations in maxillary and mandibular anterior and posterior teeth were evaluated. The study contained inlay, onlay, crown, veneer, post, and adhesive-wing preparations and implants for gold, porcelain-fused-to-metal, and ceramic restorations. The preparation finish line relative to the crest of the marginal gingiva, type of restoration, and position of the teeth were recorded. Three categories were established to rate impression quality: perfect impressions, with an absence of any voids or bubbles and perfect reproduction of the preparation finish line, were rated Criteria I; acceptable impressions, with minimal defects ( 2 mm) not involving the preparation finish line, were rated Criteria II; and unacceptable impressions, with larger voids or bubbles (> 2 mm) or defects involving the preparation finish line, were rated Criteria III. Results: Overall, 96.86% of the final impressions were clinically acceptable, 89.43% of which were rated Criteria I and 7.43% of which were rated Criteria II. Only 3.14% of the impressions were unacceptable and rated Criteria III. A significant influence on impression quality was found when the preparation finish line was more than 2 mm subgingival (P < .004), as well as when a beveled preparation was used (P < .004). The position of the teeth (P > .404) had no significant effect. Conclusion: Surface-activated polyvinyl siloxane impression material offers high predictability to avoid bubbles and voids in the final impression. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:270274.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog