LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 20 , Issue 2
March/April 2007

Pages 125131


A Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of 2 Methods for Fabricating Implant-Prosthodontic Frameworks

Sara A. Al-Fadda, BDS, MSc, FRCD(C) / George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C) / Yoav Finer, B Med Sc, DMD, MSc, PhD, MSc, FRCD(C)


PMID: 17455431

Purpose: To compare the in vitro 3-dimensional (3D) accuracy of fit of laser-scanned Computer Numeric Controlled (CNC)milled implant titanium frameworks to that of conventional cast frameworks. Materials and Methods: Nine cast frameworks were fabricated on the mandibular master casts of 9 patients with 5 implants each following the well-established conventional fabrication technique. The frameworks were then laser scanned, and 9 CNC-milled titanium frameworks matching the outline of the conventional frameworks were fabricated. The accuracy of fit of both framework types was measured using a contact-type coordinate measuring machine and a computer program developed specifically for this purpose. Statistical analysis was done by a series of paired t tests. Results: The laser-scanned CNC-milled frameworks showed significantly less distortion along the x-axis (transversal, dx) compared with the conventional frameworks (means: 33.7m and 49.2 m, respectively) (P = .011). The titanium frameworks also demonstrated significantly less distortion on the horizontal plane compared with the conventional frameworks (means: 56 m and 85 m, respectively) (P = .012). The dy (sagittal) and dz (vertical) axes and total 3D distortion (⁄dx2 + dy2 + dz2) showed less distortion overall in the laser-scanned CNC-milled frameworks, but this was not statistically significant (mean: 22.3 vs 35.6 m, 13.3 vs 59.2 m, 51 vs 114.1 m, respectively, for y, z, and 3D distortion). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, fabrication of an implant-prosthodontic framework using the CNC milling technique yields a more accurate fit than the currently used cast technique. In vivo studies are needed to investigate the clinical significance of this recorded difference. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:125131.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

IJP Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help