LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 29 , Issue 4
July/August 2016

Pages 403405


Handling of Polyvinylsiloxane Versus Polyether for Implant Impressions

Daniel Farhan, DDS, Dr Med Dent/Wiebke Lauer, DDS/Guido Heydecke, DDS, Dr Med Dent Habil/Ghazal Aarabi, DDS, Dr Med Dent/Daniel R. Reissmann, DDS, Dr Med Dent, PhD


PMID: 27479351
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4663

Purpose: This study compared polyvinylsiloxane with polyether in handling dental impressions. Materials and Methods: Each participant (N = 39) made four impressions, each a combination of pickup and reseating techniques with polyether or polyvinylsiloxane, of one implant cast representing a specific clinical situation (tooth gaps, limited residual dentition, or edentulous jaw). Handling of impressions was subsequently rated by using a 12-item questionnaire with 100-mm visual analog scales. Results: While mean satisfaction scores were higher for polyvinylsiloxane than for polyether (69.5/63.0, P < .001), differences among subgroups were statistically significant only for pickup technique, limited residual dentition, and edentulous jaw. Conclusion: Implant impressions made with polyvinylsiloxane using a pickup technique seem to be the best option for most clinical situations.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2019 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

IJP Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help