|
Purpose: This study compared the effects of an antimicrobial agent (Asepto-Sol) on the
physical properties of types III, IV, and V gypsum casts made from two types of impression
materials. Materials and Methods: Selected physical properties of five gypsum-based dental
stones (Prima-Rock, Ortho Stone, New Fujirock, Die-Keen, Microstone) and two resin-based
dental stones (Resin-Rock, Instone) were evaluated using an addition silicone impression
material (Reprosil) and an irreversible hydrocolloid (Jeltrate Plus). In group 1, Asepto-Sol
solution replaced water as the gauging liquid for the seven dental stones. The mixed
gypsum was poured directly onto impressions of two master dies using two impression
materials. In group 2, impressions made with both impression materials were sprayed with
the Asepto-Sol solution, left for 10 minutes, rinsed for 30 seconds with tap water, and
poured with each dental stone mixed with deionized water. In group 3 (control), the
gypsums were mixed with deionized water and the mixed stone was poured directly into
impressions, with no exposure to Asepto-Sol. The physical properties evaluated for the
gypsum specimens were linear dimensional change, detail reproduction, Knoop hardness,
and transverse strength. Results: The linear dimensional stability, detail reproduction, and
transverse strength tests were relatively unaffected by the use of Asepto-Sol, with few
exceptions. Detail reproduction appeared to be least affected by Asepto-Sol, and changes in
Knoop hardness were noted but results differed among the seven dental stones. However,
New Fujirock was not ideally matched with Jeltrate Plus, and no stone specimens could be
produced. Conclusion: Whether mixed with the gypsum powder or sprayed on impressions,
Asepto-Sol solution did not adversely affect the physical properties of the dental stones
tested. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:65–71.
|