Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
IJP Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJP
The International Journal of Prosthodontics

Edited by George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

ISSN 0893-2174

Publication:
January/February 2004
Volume 17 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

A Retrospective Study on the Treatment Outcome of Wide-Bodied Implants

Sang-Wan Shin, DDS, MPH, PhD, MSc/S. Ross Bryant, BSc, DDS, MSc, PhD, FRCD(C)/George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C), Odont Dr hc, LLD, MD

Pages: 5258
PMID: 15008233

Purpose: This retrospective study documented the 5-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) of 5- mm-diameter wide-bodied implants in posterior jaws as related to identified risk factors and relative host bone site dimensions. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four wide-bodied implants placed consecutively in the posterior jaws of 43 patients were matched using several identified risk factors with 64 regular-diameter implants (3.75-mm or 4-mm diameter) placed in the posterior jaws of 25 of the same patients and 14 others. Life table analyses were undertaken to examine the difference in CSR between the groups. Multivariate Cox regression was conducted to assess the relationship between potential risk factors and overall CSR. Results: Ten of the wide-bodied implants failed (CSR 80.9%), while two of the regular-diameter implants failed (CSR 96.8%). The difference between the groups was statistically significant. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant predictive relationship between overall CSR and the ratio of implant volume to remaining bone volume. This suggests that relative determinants of critical bone volume to implant dimensions may need to be considered when planning implant surgery. Conclusion: Wide-bodied implants placed in the posterior jaw can suffer a significantly elevated risk of implant failure compared to regular-diameter implants. This susceptibility may relate to either implant design or the relative relationship of implant to host bone dimensions. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:5258.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog