LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 25 , Issue 4
July/August 2012

Pages 403-409


Prospective Clinical Study of Zirconia-Based Posterior Four-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses: Four-Year Follow-up

María P. Salido, DDS, Dr Odont/Francisco Martínez-Rus, DDS, Dr Odont/Fernando del Río, MD, DDS/Guillermo Pradíes, DDS, Dr Odont/Mutlu Özcan, Dr Med Dent, PhD/María J. Suárez, MD, Dr Med, DDS, Dr Odont


PMID: 22720293

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical performance of zirconia-based posterior four-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after 4 years of clinical observation. Materials and Methods: Between 2006 and 2010, 10 patients (5 women, 5 men; mean age: 52.8 years) received 17 posterior four-unit FDPs. Two calibrated examiners evaluated the FDPs independently 1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after placement using California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. Periodontal status was assessed on both the abutment and contralateral control teeth using Plaque Index, Gingival Index, probing attachment level, and Margin Index parameters. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Three restorations were lost because of fractures at their distal connectors after a mean clinical service of 25.3 months, and one abutment tooth was extracted because of vertical root fracture 23 months after cementation. Three FDPs presented chipping of a moderate size 1 week before framework fracture, and minor chipping was observed in 2 other FDPs 1 week and 36 months after cementation. After 4 years of clinical service, the cumulative survival rate of the posterior four-unit FDPs was 76.5%. No caries lesions were detected on the abutment teeth. The remaining restorations were judged to be satisfactory according to the CDA criteria. Periodontal parameters did not show significant differences between test and control teeth, but Gingival Index scores demonstrated a slight increase in inflammation in the distal abutments after 4 years (P = .016). Conclusions: The use of zirconia-based posterior four-unit FDPs should be restricted for patients with high esthetic demands, except in patients where at least 4 mm of height is available for connector thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:403–409.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

IJP Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help