Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Endodontic Practice Today
ENDO Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
Official Site
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: ENDO

 

ENDO - Endodontic Practice Today

Edited by Antionio Bonaccorso, Bun San Chong, Edgar Schafer, and Luc van der Sluis

Official Publication of the Belgian Association for Endodontology and Traumatology (BAET), the French Society of Endodontics (SFE) and the Norwegian Endodontic Society (NEF)

ISSN (print) 1753-2809 • ISSN (online) 1753-2817

Publication:

Fall 2011
Volume 5 , Issue 3



Pages: 209 - 213
Back
Share Abstract:

Comparative study of the radiopacity of endodontic sealers with different chemical compositions

Zeferino, Eduardo Gregatto / Cunha, Rodrigo Sanches / Bellato, Thaís Sturion / Filho, José Edir Guedes / De Martin, Alexandre Sigrist / Bueno, Carlos Eduardo da Silva

Aim: The objective of the present study was to compare the radiopacity of endodontic sealers based on three different chemical compositions: epoxy resin and calcium hydroxide (Acroseal and Sealer 26), zinc oxide eugenol (Endofill, Endométhasone N, N-Rickert), and methacrylate resin (RealSeal). Materials and methods: Three specimens measuring 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were prepared from each test material and radiographed next to a 1- to 8-mm-thick aluminium stepwedge using occlusal films. The radiographs were digitised, and optical density was used to determine the radiopacity of the materials according to a greyscale with levels ranging from 0 to 255. The data was submitted to the variance test (ANOVA, P < 0.05) as well as to the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welch and Quiot test (REGWQ) for multiple comparisons of the means. Results: The greyscale level means for the materials, in increasing order, were: Acroseal – 125.3; Sealer 26 – 144.3; Endométhasone N – 155; Endofill – 175.3; RealSeal – 183; N-Rickert – 188.3. None of the materials presented a radiopacity mean level significantly lower than that obtained with 4 mm of aluminium (111.3), which was used as a reference to compare the sealers following ANSI/ ADA specification 57 (2 mm thicker than the test specimen). Conclusions: All of the endodontic sealers evaluated presented a radiopacity level above the minimum required.

Keywords: dental materials, dental radiography, endodontics, root canal obturation, sealer

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog