Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Endodontic Practice Today
ENDO Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
Official Site
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: ENDO

 

ENDO - Endodontic Practice Today

Edited by Bun San Chong and Edgar Schäfer

Official Publication of the Belgian Association for Endodontology and Traumatology (BAET) and the French Society of Endodontics (SFE)

ISSN (print) 1753-2809 • ISSN (online) 1753-2817

Publication:

Summer 2016
Volume 10 , Issue 2



Pages: 95–103
Back
Share Abstract:

Rubber dam acceptance by patients treated by undergraduate and postgraduate students

Eirini P Fragouli / Xenos M Petridis / Maria K Georgopoulou

Aim: The aims of the present survey were to record the views of patients on their experience of rubber dam (RD) use in an objective manner and evaluate the influence of several personal and clinical factors on patient opinion.

Methodology: A simple questionnaire was distributed to 116 patients receiving root canal treatment in the Dental School of Athens University. The sample was divided into two groups; adult patients receiving treatment under RD from (a) final-year students and (b) postgraduate students. Data were analysed using: a) exact tests and b) univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic models.

Results: Overall, patients’ current experience and preference for future RD use were positive. Although slight differences were detected between the two groups of patients, concerning their experience and future preference, no clear trend was found. A positive association between current experience and future RD use was demonstrated among all participants (P < 0.001). The probability of a less favorable outcome regarding patients’ current experience and their preference for future RD use were higher as the placement time was increasing (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). The probability of a less favorable outcome regarding patients’ current experience was higher as usage duration was increasing and the effect was more pronounced amongst patients treated by postgraduate students.

Conclusions: Evidence suggesting positive patient attitudes to RD use is presented. Overall, patient opinion concerning current experience of RD use and future preference did not differ significantly in relation to the experience of the clinicians. Patients’ current experience exerted significant leverage on their future preference.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog