Home Subscription Services

The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
EJED Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Official Site
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: IJED


The International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry

Edited by Alessandro Devigus, DMD

Official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry

ISSN 1862-0612


Spring 2013
Volume 8 , Issue 1

Share Abstract:

Effect of curing light distance and different mouthwashes on the sorption and solubility of a nanofilled composite

Miranda, Diego de Azevedo / Bertoldo, Carlos Eduardo dos Santos / Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria Bovi / Aguiar, Flávio Henrique Baggio / Lima, Débora Alves Nunes Leite / Lovadino, José Roberto

Pages: 88-102
PMID: 23390622

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the sorption (Sp) and solubility (Sl) of a nanofilled composite (Filtek™ Z350) light-activated from the top in three curing light distances (0 mm, 3 mm and 6 mm) and immersed in three different mouthwashes (Plax Fresh Mint, Plax Alcohol Free, and Plax Whitening). Specimens (6 mm Ř and 1 mm height) were prepared (n = 5) and initially the degree of conversion (DC%) of discs was obtained by using a fourier transform infrared spectrometer. Then, the specimens were placed in a desiccator at 37°C and were weighed until a constant mass (m1) was obtained. The discs were immersed in the mouthwashes for 30 days. Twice a day, the samples were immersed in 2 ml of the mouthwashes (12 hr intervals). After the 30-day period, the discs were reweighed (m2). The reconditioning in the desiccator was done until a constant mass (m3) was obtained. The data of DC% were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) in split plots and the results showed statistical difference when photoactivated to 6 mm from the tip of the curing unit. The sorption data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Test at a 5% level of significance and it was observed that a statistical difference (P < 0.05) was only cured when the distance was 6 mm, but there was no difference in sorption between mouthwashes. The solubility data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis’s Test (P = 0.05) and Dunn’s Test, since a non-normal data distribution was observed. The values were negative, which means that there was a mass gain, masking the real solubility.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


  © 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog