Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
EJED Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
Official Site
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: CMF

 

Journal of Craniomandibular Function

Editor in Chief: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang B. Freesmeyer, Berlin

Official publication of the International Society of Computerized Dentistry

ISSN 1868-4149

Publication:

Summer 2012
Volume 4 , Issue 2

Back
Share Abstract:

The variability of centric jaw relations in the process chain of prosthetic restorations and their neuromuscular effects

Etz, Eike / Hellmann, Daniel / Giannakopoulos, Nikolaos Nikitas / Schmitter, Marc / Rammelsberg, Peter / Schindler, Hans J.



Pages: 141 - 156

Objective: A key factor for successful prosthetic rehabilitation is the reconstruction and/or stabilization of a physiological jaw relation. The bite registration technique of choice should here exhibit a high degree of reproducibility. The objective of this study was to determine how precisely the initially recorded jaw relation can be transferred to a prosthetic reconstruction, and how these two positions influence the bilateral activity of the masticatory muscles. Materials and methods: In 41 healthy subjects, 41 examiners incorporated simulated prosthetic restorations (SPRs) that were fabricated according to the procedures commonly used during prosthetic reconstructions. With the aid of the Zebris (WinJaw, Zebris Medical, Isny, Germany) jaw measurement analysis (JMA) system, the positions of the mandible were compared in intercuspation, with an incorporated centric bite record and an incorporated SPR at designated measuring locations of both condyles, the first molars on each side and at the incisal point. At the same time, the electromyographical activities of the masseter muscles and anterior temporal muscles were examined bilaterally under controlled isometric conditions. Results: The positions of the mandible with the centric bite record and the SPR differed significantly (P < 0.05). A difference of approximately 0.3 mm in the absolute shift of the spatial position was determined at all five measuring points between both positions; this essentially corresponded to a caudal shift of the mandible. The electromyographical (EMG) activities in these positions showed significant differences (P < 0.05) for the temporal muscles. Conclusions: In summary, the findings reveal that a centric jaw relation recorded using this technique can be transferred to a prosthetic reconstruction with the differences described in this article. Keywords: accuracy of the recording of the centric jaw relation, centric bite record, centric jaw relation, electromyography, prosthetic reconstruction

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog