Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The Chinese Journal of Dental Research
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
Official Site
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: CJDR

 

The Chinese Journal of Dental Research

Edited by Xu Chen MA

Official journal of the Chinese Stomatological Association

ISSN (print) 1462-6446 • ISSN (online) 1867-5646

Publication:

Fall 2008
Volume 11 , Issue 2

Back
Share Abstract:

Arch Expansion in Cleft Lip and Palate Children: a Comparison between Rapid Palatal Expansion and Quad Helix Expansion Appliances

Rub, Najeeb Abu / Samsudin, Ab Rani / Burhanuddin, Ahmad / Abdullah, Nizam

Pages: 108-114

Objective:To compare the arch expansion effect between the Quad Helix (QH) palatal expansion appliance and the rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliance. Methods:The sample consisted of 27 cleft lip and palate children who required palatal expansion as part of their orthodontic treatment: 13 were treated with the QH and 14 with the RPE. Dental casts were taken before treatment and at the end of the retention period after expansion. Inter-canine width, inter-molar width, and palatal depth were measured in each cast. In addition, occlusal radiographs were obtained before and 2 weeks after expansion to evaluate sutural separation by the appliances. Results: Posterior crossbites were corrected in all patients following expansion. Both the QH and the RPE groups produced significant increases in inter-canine width (2.11 mm and 3.08 mm, respectively) and maxillary inter-molar width (3.49 mm and 4.80 mm, respectively). Neither the QH nor the RPE group demonstrated a significant change in palatal depth (-0.50 mm and -0.46 mm, respectively). The ratio of skeletal change to total expansion was greater in the RPE group (0.30) than that in the QH group (0.18). Conclusion: It was suggested that both the QH and the RPE appliances were capable of expanding the maxillary dentition and alveolar process, and were equally capable of correcting posterior crossbites. RPE was more effective in the midpalatal suture separation.

Keywords: cleft lip and palate, palatal expansion, quad helix, rapid palatal expansion

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog