Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
The American Journal of Esthetic Dentistry
OCTE Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: AJED

 

The American Journal of Esthetic Dentistry

Edited by Richard J. Simonsen, DDS, MS

ISSN 2162-2833 (print) • ISSN 2162-2841 (online)

Publication:
The American Journal of Esthetic Dentistry
Winter 2011
Volume 1 , Issue 2

Back
Share Abstract:

Influence of Enamel Layering Thickness on Chroma, Value, and VITA Shade for Esthetic Composite Resin Restorations

Sillas Duarte, Jr, DDS, MS, PhD/Ana Luisa Botta Martins de Oliveira, DDS, MS/Jin-Ho Phark, DDS, Dr Med Dent

Pages: 158168

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different layering thicknesses of composite resin on chroma and value. Three enamel-shade VITA-based composite resins (Filtek Supreme Ultra Enamel [SPUE], Durafill VS [DFVS], and Estelite Omega Enamel [EOE]) and one body-shade VITA-based composite resin (Filtek Supreme Ultra Body [SPUB]) with different percentages of filler by volume were investigated (shade A1). Specimens of 0.5-, 1.0-, 1.5-, and 2.0-mm thickness and 10-mm diameter were fabricated (n = 3). Optical properties and VITA Classical shade were measured with a spectrophotometer. Chroma (C*ab) and value (*L) were determined. To determine the influence of thickness on the optical parameters, Pearson correlations between thickness and chroma and between thickness and value were calculated. Two-way analysis of variance was computed for all composite resins (α = .05). Chroma increased as the thickness increased (r = 0.465), whereas the value decreased (r = 0.769). Chroma and value were significantly different among the four composite resins (P < .0001). The highest chroma was observed for DFVS, whereas the lowest chroma was found for SPUE. The highest value was found for SPUE, whereas the lowest value was found for EOE and SPUB. VITA shade remained unchanged for SPUE and SPUB, irrespective of the thickness. The increase in thickness changed the basic VITA shade for DFVS and EOE after 1.5 mm. Increasing the thickness of the enamel layer results in increased chroma and decreased value. Enamel layers should be restricted to a maximum thickness of 1.0 mm. (Am J Esthet Dent 2011;1:158168.)

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog